Sunday, March 8, 2015

Changing Concepts

    It would be difficult to enumerate all of the many erroneous assumptions based on superstitious experiences of early cultures. Beliefs and practices that have become antiquated in the light of a developing and emerging scientific accumulation of knowledge.

     Thousands of years before there were any organized cultural or sociological rules and laws, humans had made observations about nature that seemed rational and were commonly accepted as realistic for people to believe that the world was essentially flat. This assumption became woven into the fabric of their lives in such a way that any suggestion to the contrary would elicit immediate rebuke. This seemingly natural assumption was ingrained into cultural legends which included the presumed hazards that awaited anyone who ventured too near the edge of their world. Early sailors never sailed far from shore, always keeping within sight of land. Stories of ships and sailors lost at sea continued to fuel the flat earth theory and were assumed to have fallen into oblivion by sailing too close to the edge of the world. 

     For thousands of years, mankind believed the earth was flat until the Greeks began to master sailing across the Aegean and Mediterranean seas, when the notion of a round earth began to emerge. Pythagoras (6th century BCE) has been credited as the first to suggest the earth was ball like in structure. This was only a theory accepted by limited consensus for several centuries. It was not until Ferdinand Magellan's (1519-1522) circumnavigating the planet that Western European cultures finally began to accept the theory as a probable fact.

     The primary resistance to this new theory of a spherical world was led by cultures and religious societies which were either based on, or influenced by the superstitions, myths and legends of ancient religious texts.

     Another primitive theory that was very closely tied to the flat earth assumption, was the consideration that this world was the center of the universe. This too, was a very natural assumption based on early observations of the motion of heavenly bodies, i.e., sun, moon, stars, etc. The first notion purposed to conflict with these early assumptions was made in the 3rd century BCE, by Aristarchus of Samos, who suggested that the Sun was the center of the universe. It was many centuries later before this notion was to become supported by credible scholars.  Nicolaus Copernicus formulated his theory of a spherical orb in his thesis, On the Revolutions of the Celestial Spheres, in the early 1500s, which was widely circulated throughout astronomical circles and began to gain wide recognition as a credible theory and began to detail the position of not only a center of the universe, but positions of known planets.

     As improvements to scientific instruments became available, other pioneers such as Galileo Galilei (1564-1642) contributed further support to the Copernicus theory. In so doing, he incurred the wrath of the Roman Catholic Inquisition who placed him under house arrest for the last nine years of his life for suspicion of being a heretic of scripture. All publications of Copernicus, Galileo and others referring to the Sun as the center of the known universe were banned. It was not until 1992, 350 years after the condemnation of Galileo, that the Roman Catholic church officially acknowledged that Galileo was correct, and that the planet earth does indeed orbit around the sun.

     Today, our scientific knowledge has taken precedent over a previous belief of the Sun as center of the universe and has determined that there is a center of the Milky Way Galaxy, of which our Solar system is only a small part. Further, as there exists billions of Galaxies throughout space, there is no known center of the universe.

     Another phenomena that has existed for millions of years and has been considered an omen of various sorts, is the rainbow. For the most part, it has/is generally considered a good rather than bad omen. Rainbows occur in many ancient myths and legends as signs of good fortune or hope, as in the Biblical story of Noah, the Celtic legend of a location of a pot of gold, or the Greco-Roman mythology that rainbows are paths for messengers to travel between heaven and earth.

     Although many early scientists have attempted to explain rainbows, it fell to Sir Isaac Newton and his studies of optics to finally provide an accurate account of the prismatic rainbow effect. As a mathematician/scientist his contributions to the wealth of scientific knowledge of the day was immeasurable and has laid the foundation for much of what we know today concerning mathematics, optics, gravity, etc.

     These are but a few of the many myths, legends and mysteries which have been explained by a developing knowledge bank of scientific information about our universe. There still remains a segment of our population which will never understand nor accept the reality of these phenomena. They continue to embrace literal dogmas of fundamental religious explanations of the universe based on ancient texts that were written before cultures had any means of scientific discovery or theorems. The Six Day Creation believers, the Young Earth Theorists, and a Spirit world of eternal reward or punishment before and/or after a physical life on this planet, are only a few of the more familiar groups. These societies are reluctant to accept scientific explanations of events and phenomena, because they conflict with the myths or their ancient texts and perceive any intrusion of modern science threatens their fundamental concepts. Like the Flat Earth theorists of long ago, they will cling to archaic beliefs until they become extinct.

     The beliefs and concepts of religious societies are numerous. There is no limit to a combination of superstitions, myths, legends or ideas that can be assembled to support almost any belief system imaginable. Ten thousand years ago, the choices were limited to the natural events that challenged or threatened our ancestors. Today, these choices have been multiplied by an immeasurable factor to the point where almost anything can be conjured up to become a belief system to fit any situation, whether or not there are provable facts to support it. The variety of these concepts and the charlatans who use them are innumerable as there are cultures:
     The Branch Davidians, founded by David Koresh, 1959
     Heaven’s Gate, founded by Marshall Applewhite and Bonnie Nettles, early 1970s
     The People’s Temple Commune, founded by Jim Jones, 1950s
     Scientology, founded by L. Ron Hubbard, 1952
     The Unification Church, founded by Reverend Sun Myung Moon, 1954
     Fundamentalist Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints, founded by Warren Jeffs, late 1990s
     The Twelve Tribes, founded by Elbert Eugene Spriggs, 1971
But to name only a few.

     It is true, as Leo Tolstoy suggests, there are as many minds as there are heads and each mind perceives life through its own unique vision. A common consensus of truth comes only through discovery and arduous testing. The “truths” of thousands of years ago are not intended to be the “truths” of today. Human minds were created to gather knowledge not only of the current universe, but to generate an ever clearer picture of the history of our past and the direction of our future. To remain shackled to archaic concepts and superstitions is to deny the purpose of our existence.

Keith Crowe
2 / 2015

1 comment: